Source catalogue

Zygmunt III accuses the city authorities of hindering the settlement between the Jesuits and the Jews. The owners of the land that the Jews want to buy for the Jesuits are, according to the King, ready to sell it for appropriate payment, but the city's opposition blocks the agreement. The King again demands that the settlement be brought to fruition.

The King entrusts Piotr Ożga, the land judge of Lwów, to present ways to end the long-standing dispute between the Jesuits and the Jews. He calls on the authorities of Lwów to carry out the exchange of plots, discussed with their representatives in Kraków, without further delay.

Zygmunt III reminds that the authorities of Lwów themselves supported the establishment of the Jesuit college. He then accuses them of hindering the matter and inciting the mob. He sends delegates to remove obstacles and begin the foundation; he calls for cooperation under threat of royal disfavor.

The King calls on the authorities of Lwów to execute the arbitrators' decision regarding the foundation of the Jesuit college. He reminds them of the consent of the city representatives and his own approval of the settlement, demands an end to the delay, and presents the foundation as an ornament to the city.

The King recalls a previous mandate ordering the execution of the decree regarding the city and the Jesuits and a fair appraisal of the houses they need for construction for worship and the education of youth. Outraged by the delay, he demands immediate execution of the decree and warns against further action against the authorities of Lwów.

The King informs that Piekarski wounded him in the head at the entrance to the church, but there is no threat to his life. He orders the public announcement of this news so that hostile persons do not use the event to incite unrest.

The King receives frequent complaints from the townspeople of Lwów against Starosta Stanisław Bonifacy Mniszech. Before proceeding to execute parliamentary and court decrees, he asks Bishop Achacy Grochowski to admonish the starosta and lead to an agreement with the city, while preserving and increasing municipal liberties according to the newly granted privilege.

The King instructs the starosta to provide timber from the starosty forests for the palisade and wooden supports. He demands effective assistance for the magistrate in collecting contributions for the fortification, including from residents of noble and ecclesiastical houses.

The King recommends assisting the Augustinians, who acquired the site of the former convent of the nuns of St. Catherine of Siena behind the Halicz Gate. He points to the obtained consent of the archbishop and asks for municipal support and no obstacles to construction.

The Dominicans bought a house next to the monastery and want to connect it to the monastery wall. The King demands the city's consent, arguing that voluntary permission will not violate its privileges.

The King orders the Lwów magistrate to settle with Jan Torosowicz for uncollected dues and costs incurred by him, in accordance with the agreement of the Abbot of Wąchock, scribe of the Crown Treasury.

The Dominicans complain to the King about the cramped conditions of the church and monastery and the lack of a proper cemetery, forcing burials by the public street. They ask for the possibility of purchasing townhouses near the church. The King orders a commission to be sent to resolve the disputed legal issues and demands the city's assistance without hindering the monastic undertaking.

The King orders both commissions to cooperate in recovering the silver of the Żółkiew church, taken from the deposit in the Lwów Cathedral during the Turkish siege. The items or their fair equivalent must be recovered, and those guilty of illegal trade in them must be judged.

The Augustinians, through their provincial and the royal preacher, request the resumption of services in Loreto. The King orders the city not to interfere with their return and ministry.

The authorities of Old Warsaw declare solidarity with other magistrates in the defense of rights and justice. They inform that the regional council of the Warsaw land has already ended at the stage of electing a marshal. They assure of an attempt to gain other lands and voivodeships for the addressees' postulates.

Elbląg declares solidarity with the Lwów magistrate and support for the protection of municipal authorities. Since the provincial assemblies ended unsuccessfully and no deputies to the Sejm were elected, it cannot fulfill the request in that way. It announces that the secretary, who is soon to leave for Warsaw, will receive instructions to lobby the Grand Chancellor and other protectors for a favorable resolution of Lwów's case.

The magistrate of Lublin thanks for the interest in an unusual unfortunate event and for the letters of intercession. It asks for the case, which is to be examined by the Tribunal, to be recommended to the Archbishop of Lwów, and for the attached letter to be delivered. It does not describe the event itself nor name the parties to the dispute.

The councilors of Lwów describe the securing of Wyrzykowski's movable property, efforts regarding the escheat in the absence of proven relatives, and the return of the items after his return from the camp. They recommend using the receipt in defense against a later claim. They also send files for the case with the chapter, concerning the road and the object behind the Halicz Gate, asking for active defense and the return of the documents.

The councilors refer to royal privileges allowing them to present candidates for clergy to churches on city land. They ask the Bishop of Chełm for a pious priest, a supporter of the union, who will take over one of these churches. They want his quick arrival, preferably within two weeks, and promise protection and assistance.

The councilors maintain their readiness to provide the king with one hundred thousand zlotys in connection with the contract regarding the lease of the Lwów excise and Ruthenian customs. They explain that the departure of the Wąchock abbot and the enemy's actions delayed the negotiations. They ask the treasury administrator to allocate provisions for the Lwów garrison from this sum, as its lack threatens the city's security.

The councilors ask the royal secretary Jerzy Januszewicz for help at the court. They maintain their offer of one hundred thousand zlotys for the needs of the Republic, provided that the sum is settled by reducing the dues from the lease of the Lwów excise and Ruthenian customs. The dispatch of delegates was delayed by the danger of war. The city awaits a safe route and news about the king's whereabouts.

Alberti assures of his zeal in carrying out the recipient's orders. He writes about the liveries of a gentleman with an uncertainly read surname, intends to support the case, and obtain the necessary letter. He conveys his respects to the voivodess.

The prior acknowledges the obligation to appear before the assessor's court, but asks for the case to be resolved by the city council court to avoid costs. He wants commissioners appointed to view documents concerning the monastery's lands. Due to a recent urgent departure, he asks for a week to return, exemption from assessor deadlines, and consent for further construction until an amicable resolution, with the buildings to go to whoever is awarded the land.

The author asks for urgent intercession with the general for his "grandson", Fr. Rusnowski [?], in the matter of the Warsaw archdeaconry. He complains about the competition of Canon Suszycki [?] and cites a written promise.

Jan Bielicki thanks on behalf of the college for the favor conveyed by Fr. Perkowicz. He offers wishes for Janowiny, combining them with the image of the Incarnate Word and the cradle of Jesus. He does not state the type or value of the gift.

The clergyman complains about Tarabultowski's conduct and the verdict issued in his absence. He asks Niewęgłowski to transfer the case to the Tribunal. He attaches a detailed list of court and travel expenses.

Jordan asks the mayor to capture a carpenter who was supposed to leave agreed work and did not keep the contract. He is to be imprisoned in the town hall at the request of the complaining clergyman; the letter does not confirm the execution of the order.

Carmelite Walenty asks the President of Lwów for the official release of Górski's belongings and papers stored at Herbut's. The saber remains disputed due to a claim for one zloty; the monk promises a receipt of collection.

The author notifies Samuel Stan of the Bishop of Przemyśl's consent to adjourn the case. He calls for a personal arrival or sending written explanations and recommends a preacher to Brzozów.

Wyhowski explains his silence due to difficulties, assures Kemény of their lasting friendship, and announces the Hetman's embassy to the Prince of Transylvania after his son's wedding in Moldavia.

Winnicki presents the dispute with Metropolitan Załęski over the archimandrites in Walawa, Dermań, and Dubno. He asks the voivode for intercession with the nuncio after filing an appeal; the letter itself does not settle the rights to the benefices.

Invitation for councilors to a meeting tomorrow at 2:00 PM: future burdens on townhouses sold to Jews by the Jesuits, recovery of files after Łaskowski, and a contested contract regarding the shoemakers' guild chapel.

The Jesuit General thanks Lwów for its kindness towards the order. He emphasizes that he received the news from credible witnesses and promises prayers for the council and the residents. Original dated 1626, cover 1616.

Garbowski responds to the complaint of the Lwów authorities against Canon Gudłowski. He announces the filing of a lawsuit and the examination of the case once the interested parties appear, assuring them of justice.

Gembicki asks the wójt and the elders of the Lwów Armenians to postpone the execution of the assessor court's decree until the Sejm, where the community's dispute with the bishop is to be examined.

The Nuncio asks the authorities of Lwów to restrain the opponents of the Armenian archbishop and his followers. The letter uses the polemical term "schismatics" and appeals to the protection of believers.

Grochowski invites the councillors of Lviv to an episcopal ceremony on 27 September 1625. He stresses friendship, his Ruthenian origin and Lviv’s significance as a metropolitan centre.

The Archbishop of Damietta acknowledges a letter about the Lviv furriers’ dispute. He promises to consider the requests in accordance with justice and within his discretion, offering assistance in other matters too.

The sender addresses the noble sirs and mentions the appointment of the suffragan bishop of Lviv, as well as the addressees’ merits and goodwill. The manuscript is damaged and illegible in many places; the details of the matter and the names cannot be reconstructed with confidence. The letter is dated in Warsaw, 9 December 1723. The sender’s signature is illegible.

The sender addresses a high-ranking recipient and asks for a favor or recommendation; he also mentions a petition/request and benefits received. A substantial part of the text is difficult to read. The ending contains the notation “Camorali li 11 del 1690” (partly read; month absent/illegible) and an illegible signature. No date or place has been assigned without a full reading. The address leaf mentions Palatino di Russia and Leopoli.