Source catalogue

The King instructs Jabłonowski to stop two banners of the district expedition from beating residents, requisitioning food by robbery, making arbitrary assignments, and entering the city with horses. He allows the army to be supplied from surrounding estates due to military necessity.

Gdańsk responds to the Lwów complaint of May 10 regarding the detention of the tailor Jan Koch after the expiration of his one-year contract. It cites a different account from Princess Jabłonowska, the Bracław Voivodeship Governor's wife: Koch is to be at liberty and able to return to Lwów at the beginning of September. The city does not decide the case, which is pending in royal courts.

The Lwów councilors ask the hetman to protect the municipal villages of Zubrza and Sichów and to exempt their subjects from the forced transport of oaks. They claim that the villages have already been devastated by the army and the rest of the inhabitants may leave. They propose using artillery carters who have horses and wagons.

The mayors and council of Świecie complain about the almost daily passage of soldiers and the announced arrival of dragoons numbering 90 horses, coming from Hungary for winter maintenance by order of the Inowrocław voivode. They refer to the news from the lessee and an earlier payment, the verb of which remains unread. They ask Jan Jabłonowski for help in the face of the city's impending ruin and the destitution of the inhabitants.

Świecie renews the complaint about the soldiers and states the city's losses at five hundred zlotys, and the president's at 58 zlotys 20 groszy in taken goods. It asks Jan Jabłonowski to lead to the consideration and deduction of losses when paying the army at the general Lwów commission. Separately, it asks for a receipt allowing to receive wood from the Świecie starosta's forest for a bridge threatened with destruction by ice after a hard winter; the lessee does not accept earlier receipts.

The authorities of Świecie ask their starosta for protection against the military execution of services, also dependent on the lessee's decision. They assure that they previously used his protection, apologize for an unspecified offense, and send representatives who are to explain the expenses, difficulties, and damages related to the dams, heads, and banks of the Vistula.

Alberti assures of his zeal in carrying out the recipient's orders. He writes about the liveries of a gentleman with an uncertainly read surname, intends to support the case, and obtain the necessary letter. He conveys his respects to the voivodess.

Armand confidentially reports on the Queen's agreement with her son Jakub after 10–12 days of negotiations. The Queen was to settle for a life interest in her late husband's estates; movables, jewels, and cash were to be divided equally between the brothers. He mentions the mediators and the dates of the dietines (July 27) and the convocation (August 29), which point to the year 1696.

The priest has been ill for a week. He reports an improvement but will remain in Lwów until he regains his strength and the roads improve. He regrets not listening to his benefactor; he promises gratitude and prayer.

The author refutes allegations regarding his conduct toward the townspeople and cites the freedoms promised to them. He writes about credit, debt, collateral, and attempts by some members of the magistrate to violate statutory rights. He points to pledged property and protests against its sale or further encumbrance.

Berens intends to speak with Bell the next day and offer him a pledge to obtain payment. Bell makes the settlement in Lwów conditional upon the payment of money in Gdańsk. The author announces a follow-up letter with the result of the conversation.

De Birckholtz explains to Jabłonowski that the money was intended for the hussars and pancerni. Fulfilling the request of the Włodzimierz starosta threatens the dissatisfaction of other companies; the author makes the help dependent on the inflow of funds.

Brinck writes about the imminent march towards Gdańsk and the King's desire to leave. He cites rumors about the arrival of the Queen, the Prince of Brandenburg, and the Tsar, noting that reliable information is difficult to obtain.

Piotr West announces the packing of 130 bolts of cloth into four bales. He mentions red, "perliet" [?] cloth, and a dark blue-violet shade; the division of quantities between varieties requires verification.

Gabriel sends the repaired carriage back to the Voivode via Janicki and declares his readiness to be of service. He also asks for help for his relative in military matters.

Winnicki presents the dispute with Metropolitan Załęski over the archimandrites in Walawa, Dermań, and Dubno. He asks the voivode for intercession with the nuncio after filing an appeal; the letter itself does not settle the rights to the benefices.

De Villar delivers Mr. Duport's letter to the Voivode through household members in Lwów. He explains the route of the response via a correspondence packet and declares readiness for further services.

Wojnarowski asks the Voivode for protection for his son Stefan, the Sword-bearer of Ovruch. He invokes the favor of the addressee's father, the Castellan of Kraków, and the mediation of other patrons; he announces his arrival in Kraków.

The author discusses consultations with the Standard-bearer of Sanok and the nobility before the sejmik. He asks about the reception of the universal from Żółkiew and announces talks with the opposing side to persuade participants to unity.

Wojakowski asks to maintain the voivode's favor and for mediation in an illegible property matter. He offers his services and sends greetings from his wife.

Gałecki reports from Środa on disputes during the sejmik, an attempt to break it up, and issues regarding the distribution of hiberna. He announces further information in a separate letter; part of the report and the postscript remain unread.

Glasnapp announces his arrival in Gniew at the voivode's request, but can only bring six reiters. He asks for a meeting date; he mentions the stay of the Voivode of Płock in Gdańsk.

The sender addresses the honorable voivode and benefactor, probably Jan Jabłonowski. The sender writes about a matter involving people identified as Domaradzki and [surname reading uncertain], refers to earlier proceedings, and makes a request to the addressee; details and some names remain uncertain. The letter ends with the date from Lviv, 30 January 1699. The sender’s signature is illegible.

Kazimierz Dłużewski writes to Jan Jabłonowski, Voivode of Ruthenia, about the planned election of the Chełm chamberlain. He asks that a sejmik not be convened, citing the unsuitable candidacy of the Chełm standard-bearer and the nobility’s freedom to choose. The letter was written in Lublin on 1 June; the year 1698 comes from the inventory description.

The sender addresses a high-ranking recipient and asks for a favor or recommendation; he also mentions a petition/request and benefits received. A substantial part of the text is difficult to read. The ending contains the notation “Camorali li 11 del 1690” (partly read; month absent/illegible) and an illegible signature. No date or place has been assigned without a full reading. The address leaf mentions Palatino di Russia and Leopoli.

A substantial letter survives, addressed to the Crown Marshal, probably the Grand Crown Marshal, with the salutation “Most Illustrious Lord and Brother.” The archival card describes it as a letter from Adam Jabłonowski of Lachiew to the marshal with a request (the rest of that description is uncertain); the letter itself is too difficult to read to specify the request. The signature appears to read Adam Jabłonowski. The dateline reads “W Jabłonowie 16 Decembr 1696.”