Source catalogue

The author responds to the Lwów magistrate's request regarding a matter he calls just, and writes about reaching mutual satisfaction. He assures of his favor toward the city and hopes for reciprocation. The key phrase defining the procedure, perhaps with the participation of syndics, requires re-reading; the letter does not indicate that a settlement has been concluded.

The author notifies the magistrate that a complaint has been filed before the Crown Tribunal in Lublin against the Lwów city authorities in connection with the imprisonment of a person of noble status. He claims that incarceration in a prison intended for thieves violates noble status and announces further legal steps; he asks for a response. These are the allegations of the letter's author, not a confirmed court finding.

The author presents grievances resulting from a dispute with the Lwów magistrate and asks the vice-senior to use his influence to settle the matter. He mentions actions against him in Warsaw and Lwów and paradoxically describes his status as both a councilor and a juror, as well as a person deprived of these functions. He asks for a clear response from the magistrate and the addressee, announcing that little time remains to make a decision. If the case goes to court, he reserves the importance of this letter. A later cover links the dispute to Secretary Czechowicz; the text of the letter itself does not allow for a certain determination of his role here.

The author seeks the addressee's intervention in a dispute with a man described as the Kraków chamberlain. He mentions earlier efforts with this man, his own service, costs, and the need to obtain the funds owed to him. The content is a request and an account from one side, not proof of the dispute's outcome.

The author reminds the addressee of the request for intervention regarding earned payment. He writes that his financial situation is difficult, and the reimbursement of costs and recovery of receivables would enable further service. He refers to the matter connected with the Kraków chamberlain; we do not know the addressee's response.

Berens intends to speak with Bell the next day and offer him a pledge to obtain payment. Bell makes the settlement in Lwów conditional upon the payment of money in Gdańsk. The author announces a follow-up letter with the result of the conversation.

Benedykt Bernatowicz justifies his absence before the Mayor and Councilors of Lviv due to illness, promising to present private letters in defense of his good reputation upon his recovery. Fearing the entrustment of confidential correspondence to intermediaries, he refrains from sending the documents immediately.

Biernacki reports news of a monetary execution on the estates of a certain starost, urges the addressee to appear before the Tribunal, and asks for intervention letters to avoid damage related to the lawsuit. This is a report and a request from the author, not a confirmation of a verdict or execution.

The author writes about the arrival of the starost, instructions regarding the dispute, the protection of the Voivode of Kraków, and efforts to recover money. He does not claim that the debt has already been paid.

The author apologizes for repeating requests and reminds the addressee of his own interests, which he neglected while working on the addressee's affairs. He announces further actions in the Tribunal and asks for a declaration or support. The postscript concerns the conduct of the case before the Tribunal.

The author laments that he failed to collect the money owed to the addressee or his circle. He mentions Mr. Stolborski/Stobrodziej [reading uncertain], the sejmik, possible debt security, and the need for further legal efforts; the exact configuration of parties and claims is not certain.

The author writes about an urgent matter before the Tribunal, asks for the addressee's protection, and mentions obtaining a decree. Further sentences refer to the starost and documents related to the execution; the postscript on p. 17 contains a request for intercession on behalf of another person. It is unknown whether the decree has already been issued.

The Marquis de Béthune certifies that Jerzy Livault is the brother of the late Captain Klaudiusz and asks Lwów to release the entire inheritance to him, wherever it may be. The letter does not confirm the fulfillment of this request.

The Marquise asks her son-in-law to accept a young nobleman, the son of her impoverished friend. She praises his upbringing, mathematics, and fortifications; the young man is interested in languages and foreign countries. Mr. de Balus is to mediate in the matter.

The Marquise replies to her son-in-law after her daughter's premature birth and the death of their child. She asks for care and more frequent news. She also describes her own ailments, severe hoarseness, and inability to leave her bed.

The Marquise replies to the letter of January 5. She considers the wife she gave to the addressee as the best proof of her goodwill; his satisfaction with the marriage increases her attachment to both.

In response to the letter of August 15, the Marquise praises the son-in-law's feelings toward his wife and the Queen. She makes the fullness of her goodwill dependent on their durability; she calls on him for family unity and support for the Queen's interests.

Joy over the son-in-law's return and the daughter's birth is combined with concern for portraits and shipments. The Marquise asks for counteracting moves favorable to the Emperor at the expense of France, and for letters to be shown at court. She reproaches her son-in-law for omitting the Queen's words about her.

The Marquise sends a letter via Samuel. After their shared loss, she asks her son-in-law to soothe the Queen's suffering and to show her gratitude and attachment to her interests.

The Marquise sends a letter to her daughter via Messrs. de Laforest and Brugere. She asks for more frequent news and sends greetings to the great general, the addressee's husband, and children. She reports that the King has increased her pension by 5,000 livres.

The Marquise received the only letter from her son-in-law since his departure from Rome and was concerned about his accident in the mountains. There is no news from her daughter; she assumes she might have given birth on the way. She announces the sending of the King's letter and de La Tour's letter via merchants.

The document concerns money intended for royal needs and the disposition for its expenditure. The author asks for a favorable resolution of the matter and declares gratitude; names and terms of the settlement are uncertain.

The author describes an intervention with influential people regarding a doctor and expects action from the council. He considers the proceedings of the office and the court; the essential details of the accusations require further reading.

The letter to Marcin Anczewski concerns the further handling of the case with the treasurer, treasury assignments, and the audit of documents. The author complains about the absence of his brother's name in the assignment.

Bieganowski replies after the sejmik in Wiśnia, discusses the presentation of Lwów's affairs, the deputy's instruction, and municipal burdens. He asks for actions serving an agreement with the landowners.

Bieganowski responds to complaints regarding the captain and announces the city's agreement with him. Separately, he addresses the allegations related to Radwański; he protests against abuses.

The author argues against the doctor's conduct and asks the council to protect the Jew from harm. He invokes the hetman and the Lwów sub-chamberlain; names and legal details remain partially illegible.

Rector Biegaczewicz sends Professor Podhajecki to the Lwów magistrate as a candidate for syndic, in response to the city's request. He recommends his qualifications and expects appropriate treatment and remuneration.

The author asks for urgent intercession with the general for his "grandson", Fr. Rusnowski [?], in the matter of the Warsaw archdeaconry. He complains about the competition of Canon Suszycki [?] and cites a written promise.

Jan Bielicki thanks on behalf of the college for the favor conveyed by Fr. Perkowicz. He offers wishes for Janowiny, combining them with the image of the Incarnate Word and the cradle of Jesus. He does not state the type or value of the gift.

Bieliński accuses Prince Jakub's banner of violence and damages in the Tuchola starosta district. He protests against its mission to the King and the accusation that he brought royal men to Tuchola; he asks for justice and the defense of his honor.

Bieliński complains about the General and mentions his debt from the treasury. He asks the Castellan of Kraków and the Grand Crown Hetman for mercy and protection. The details of the dispute remain poorly legible.

Bieliński asks for support at the sejmiks and an entry into the instructions before the unexpectedly scheduled Sejm. He emphasizes mutual friendship and the desire to serve the addressee's house.

Bieliński recommends to the Lviv magistrate a doctor named Matheim [spelling uncertain], who has served well in his house. The recommended person is establishing a property in the city; the author promises gratitude for the support.

The author writes about reconciling with the noble magistrate and waiting for the demands presented in writing. He proposes a conversation and invites the addressee to his place the next day before dinner. The address indicates the royal secretary Franchi.

Bielski demands the settlement of 2,600 PLN of annual rent for the palace before the Halych Gate. The tenant refers to Russian quartering. The author proposes deducting taxes and returning the rest from the public treasury.

Bielski accuses the elders of the kahal of banning wine retailing under threat of excommunication. He asks for the proclamation of the old custom in the market square and suburbs, and for the sending of a city servant and a trumpeter.

Brzeski responds to the fear of detaining Lviv merchants in connection with the Kamieniec case. He assures the safety of the Lviv citizens; he requires the customary reporting in the city. He mentions a future royal decree.

He thanks for the New Year's wishes and the gift. In a postscript, he supports the request of Łukaszewski [?] to keep him in the syndicature of the city of Lviv.

Brzozowski thanks for the kind memory, wishes, and bellaria, i.e., delicacies. He promises to return the favor at the next opportunity.

He thanks for the fish and a box of plums. He notes that he did not receive a certain customary component of the gift, probably due to a mistake by the messenger. He promises favors.

He thanks the magistrate for the provisions for the time of Lent and a box of delicacies. He assures of his attachment to the city's affairs and wishes prosperity.

Jan Brzozowski asks the clerk Zimnicki to handle the case of the suffragan priest in Warsaw. He sends a copy for signing and sealing; alternatively, he suggests the involvement of Zycherman [?].

Walerian asks his own brother Walenty for a letter, news about their mother and wife, as well as military and parliamentary news. He mentions a rumor about a friend priest's trip to Rome; there is no confirmation of his stay.

Samuel Biderman asks Arthur Forbes to order the payment of 1500. He informs about sending 23 pieces of cloth with an invoice; he discusses the quality, price, and entry on the account.

Birrell thanks Arthur Forbes for raising the matter of the boy in connection with Robert Forbes. He has written to Königsberg and expects a response and the boy's arrival for the upcoming fair. He attaches a sample of his handwriting, which he asks to be passed to Robert, and offers his services to both Forbeses.

Birrell confirms receipt of the letter from July 12. In a not fully read sentence, he mentions his trip to Lviv, his host, and his general. He apologizes for the brevity caused by lack of time.

Birrel describes an attempt to detain him along with his goods in Przeworsk in a dispute with a Jewish leaseholder collecting a fee. Initially, he denies his presence, but witnesses confirm it. According to the author, he was released after explaining that he was carrying goods for the Castellan of Kraków. He warns Forbes about the wait for his goods.

Birrell turns to Forbes for help in finding the original of a document defaming him and identifying the author. He writes about honor, reputation, and the distribution of the lampoon among their acquaintances. He points to A. Bailie as a person helpful in the investigation. An additional postscript says that some admitted to reading the text.

De Birckholtz explains to Jabłonowski that the money was intended for the hussars and pancerni. Fulfilling the request of the Włodzimierz starosta threatens the dissatisfaction of other companies; the author makes the help dependent on the inflow of funds.