132/1/537 · TsDIAL, Lwów
[Polish; translation pending] Nieustalony · [Polish; translation pending] 12 гру / 1696 / 2І чері / ятеб
Click a document title or the link below it to read its original transcription and translation.
The letter mentions the previous week, a bishop, and matters concerning dietines and public affairs. Not all names and actions can be read securely. The closing gives 1 January 1703.
Read →The letter responds to earlier correspondence; its subject remains poorly legible. The closing gives 5 February 1701. Page 44 carries an address.
Read →The letter mentions a bishopric, correspondence, and officials; the rest is too uncertain to reconstruct its substance. The date on p. 3 gives Lublin, 12 April 1696. Page 4 bears folio 2, but its relation to the letter needs further verification.
Read →The text concerns official matters and the Malbork general; references to the Chełmno Voivode and commissioners can be recognized. The notation on p. 32 may give 28 April and Heilsberg, but the year is uncertain.
Read →References to a document and correspondence addressed to the recipient can be recognized, but the substance remains uncertain. Page 35 bears the notation 1699, which is not a dated letter notation.
Read →The surviving text contains references to a Ruthenian matter, military personnel, and officials; some sentences are illegible. The date on p. 18 gives day 28 and probably May, but the year cannot be read.
Read →The letter opens with “Monseigneur”; the remaining text concerns unidentified matters. The closing notes and date are illegible or uncertain.
Read →The writer mentions news or an arrival from Wallachia, public expectations and petitions, and an audience. The brief text contains Latin insertions; not all details are legible. The date is 24 February 1703.
Read →The writer says he lacks nothing, mentions travel and the road to Malbork, and addresses the recipient about further action. The date is clearly 31 January 1703; the place is uncertain.
Read →The writer explains that he cannot stay longer, refers to matters “in spiritualibus et temporalibus,” and asks for the recipient’s continued goodwill. The text continues across pp. 58–59. The uncertain date inscription cannot be established.
Read →The letter mentions a castellan and a case before a court; references to an accusation and evidence are also visible, but details are uncertain. The date appears to be 3 December 1701.
Read →The writer discusses a matter requiring further legal action; the text contains Latin terms concerning proceedings and a reference to testimony or evidence. The details are only partly legible. The closing is dated at Malbork on 20 February 1703.
Read →The text clearly concerns illness and health, but the specific course of events remains partly illegible. The date is 13 January 1703.
Read →References to a cardinal, an instruction, and public affairs can be recognized, but the sentences are too uncertain to establish a specific decision. The date has not been read with confidence.
Read →The writer discusses a general’s case and judicial matters; references to a judgment and law can be recognized, but some sentences are illegible. The date on p. 46 is 9 November 1701.
Read →The letter mentions a commission and matters of the Sejm and administration, but the details of the actions and people remain uncertain. The closing date is 19 April 1696; the place cannot be read with confidence.
Read →The letter to the Ruthenian Voivode concerns public affairs and official actions; references to a tax and the Sejm can be recognized on p. 22. The details cannot be reconstructed securely, and no date was read.
Read →The text contains references to a commission, documents, and official actions, but the surviving sentences are uncertain. The closing date on p. 11 appears to be in April 1696; the day and year require confirmation.
Read →The writer explains that he had no new subject to write about, but incoming reports prompted a reply; he mentions correspondence and the recipient’s affairs. Parts of pp. 70–72 are illegible. The date appears to be 24 July 1700; the place is tentatively read as Heilsberg.
Read →The letter mentions General B(e)ulski/Bulski, the Malbork office, and military and public matters; the exact name and parts of the argument are uncertain. The closing date is 23 April 1701; the place may be Heilsberg, but this reading is uncertain.
Read →The writer addresses the Ruthenian Voivode; the partly legible text concerns an official matter and correspondence. The closing date is read as 18 January 1703; the place is uncertain.
Read →The letter to the Ruthenian Voivode contains references to the Malbork general, offices, and military matters. Details cannot be reconstructed securely; no date was read.
Read →The writer explains that a sudden indisposition prevented him from acting or travelling, and mentions official business and correspondence. The closing date is legible: 19 February 1701; the place is uncertain.
Read →The writer refers to dietines and actions taken in public affairs, and asks or urges the recipient to take further steps. Details are partly illegible. The date is 18 November 1702.
Read →